Skip to main content
· 8/18/2006

Stammeyer v. Division of Narcotics Enforcement of the Iowa Department of Public Safety

Citations

  • 721 N.W.2d 541
  • 180 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2481
  • 2006 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 105
  • 2006 WL 2382011

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an argument not preserved for appeal when there was “nothing indicating the court ruled upon or even considered [it]”
  • holding where “there are alternative claims or defenses, and the district court does not rule on all alternative claims or defenses, the losing party must file a post-trial motion to preserve error on the claims or defenses not ruled on”
  • finding an argument not preserved for appeal when there was “nothing indicating the court ruled upon or even considered” it
  • finding an argument not preserved for appeal when there was “nothing indicating the court ruled upon or even considered [it]”
  • finding an argument not preserved for appeal when there was “nothing indicating the court ruled upon or even considered [it]”
  • finding an argument not preserved for appeal when there was “nothing indicating the court ruled upon or even considered [it]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Streit

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.