Skip to main content
· 3/26/1997

Stamm v. Barclays Bank of New York

Citations

  • 960 F. Supp. 724
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3633
  • 1997 WL 150131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the forum-selection clause itself must have been induced by fraud to be unenforceable
  • explaining that a “claim of fraud in the inducement of a contract is insufficient” to invalidate a forum selection clause, and that it is “the inclusion of those specific clauses plaintiffs seek to avoid that must have been induced by fraud”
  • “A claim of fraud in the inducement of a contract is insufficient to invalidate a forum selection ... clause found in that contract. Rather, it is the inclusion of those specific clauses plaintiffs seek to avoid that must have been induced by fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.