Skip to main content
· 2/25/1998

Stamford Wallpaper Company, Inc. v. Tig Insurance

Citations

  • 138 F.3d 75
  • 28 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20584
  • 46 ERC (BNA) 1889
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 2954

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that arranging falls within CERCLA definition of release and disposal
  • acknowledging that under Connecticut law, the term \sudden\ has a temporal meaning
  • “We will not hypothesize or imagine episodes or events that cannot be found among the [underlying] allegations, and cannot reasonably be deduced from them.”
  • “[W]e will not hypothesize or imagine episodes or events that cannot be found among the [underlying] allegations, and cannot reasonably be deduced from them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.