Stalworth v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this Court may affirm the result reached below if it “is correct without regard to the grounds relied upon by that court”
• holding that this Court may affirm the result reached below if it “is correct without regard to the grounds relied upon by that court”
• holding that this Court may affirm the result reached below if it “is correct without regard to the grounds relied upon by that court”
• noting that it was irrelevant whether employer’s medical expert was incompetent since WCJ found claimant’s medical expert not credible and, thus, claimant did not meet her burden of proof
• noting that it was irrelevant whether employer’s medical expert was incompetent since WCJ found claimant’s medical expert not credible and, thus, claimant did not meet her burden of proof
• finding that although the opinion of the employer’s medical expert was equivocal, the WCJ rejected the testimony of the claimant’s medical expert, and as a result, the claimant did not satisfy the burden of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).