Skip to main content
· 7/11/2019

Stallworth v. Woods

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 2828

Syllabus

Mandate jurisdiction sanctions frivolous Civ.R. 11 R.C. 2323.51 subpoena. - Trial court's decision to deny motions for sanctions pursuant to Civ.R. 11 and R.C. 2323.51 was not an abuse of discretion where the record supported the finding that the subpoena that caused the underlying lawsuit was peculiar thus, the action was not frivolous despite judgment being rendered against the plaintiff. Originally assigned judge had jurisdiction to consider the motion for sanctions based on the appellate court's mandate.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.