· 7/31/1990
Stallings v. Washington University
Citations
- 794 S.W.2d 264
- 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1163
- 1990 WL 107017
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- putting no stock in argument that juror should have responded because two other jurors responded; that other jurors responded showed only that they misunderstood the question asked by counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Satz, Smith, Grimm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.