Skip to main content
· 7/31/1990

Stallings v. Washington University

Citations

  • 794 S.W.2d 264
  • 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1163
  • 1990 WL 107017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • putting no stock in argument that juror should have responded because two other jurors responded; that other jurors responded showed only that they misunderstood the question asked by counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Satz, Smith, Grimm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.