Stallings v. Carpenter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ICRA allows a plaintiff to “file a lawsuit directly in federal court,” unlike the IHRA
• Illinois courts look to cases addressing alleged violations of federal civil rights statutes to guide their interpretations under ICRA
• “Every court to consider the question since Jackson has concluded that Title VI encompasses a claim for retaliation, because Title IX and Title VI are interpreted in parallel.”
• “Every court to consider the question” since Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ, 554 U.S. 167 (2005) “has concluded that Title VI encompasses a claim for retaliation, because Title IX and Title VI are interpreted in parallel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).