Staley v. NORTHERN UTAH HEALTHCARE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a large population served by multiple hospitals increased the likelihood that anonymity would be preserved
• noting that a large population served by multiple hospitals increased the likelihood that anonymity would be preserved
• noting that a large population served by multiple hospitals increased the likelihood that anonymity would be preserved
• interpreting Utah’s privilege rule, Utah R. Evid. 506 (West 1994), which protected “information that'is communicated in confidence to a physician or mental health therapist”
• interpreting Utah’s privilege rule, Utah R. Evid. 506 (West 1994), which protected “information that is communicated in confidence to a physician or mental health therapist”
• noting little chance of identification because the hospital at issue was one of several located in an area populated by approximately 900,000 people and also drew patients from neighboring states

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).