Stalcup v. Orthotic & Prosthetic Lab, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• similarly finding where plaintiffs expert testified in support of plaintiffs theory of causation and was cross-examined as to and disagreed with defendant’s theory
• even though employee who performed the fitting was certified prosthetist, because Lab did not meet definition of health care provider, Section 516.105’s two-year statute of limitations was not applicable
• because prosthetic device fitting is not regulated under a license or certificate in the state of Missouri, the defendant did not qualify as a “health care provider” under the provisions of Chapter 538

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).