First Circuit· 10/6/2014
Stalcup v. Central Intelligence Agency
Citations
- 768 F.3d 65
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 19045
- 2014 WL 4976169
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a document labeled “draft” was properly withheld as a deliberative document because it was, inter alia, “passed on to agency management for possible policy changes”
- noting that individuals have an “inherent privacy interest irrespective of any government intervention”
- noting that individuals have an \inherent privacy interest irrespective of any government intervention\
- \The omission of a single document in this case does not negate what is otherwise a reasonable inquiry.\
- “The omission of a single document in this case does not negate what is otherwise a reasonable inquiry.”
- disclosure unwarranted when it would not “yield any new information”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Lipez, Barron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Eil v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationFirst Circuit· 2017-12-22· cited 11×
- Johnson v. Cent. Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2018-09-17· cited 6×
- In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto RicoU.S. District Court· 2019-06-06· cited 3×
- In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto RicoU.S. District Court· 2019-06-27· cited 2×
- In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto RicoU.S. District Court· 2019-07-08· cited 1×
- Eil v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationD. Rhode Island· 2016-09-16· cited 1×
- Cause of Action Institute v. U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict of Columbia· 2021-04-20
- In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto RicoU.S. District Court· 2019-05-15
- Mullane v. United States Department of JusticeFirst Circuit· 2024-08-23
- Richard Villar v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationD. New Hampshire· 2018-07-23
- Villar v. FBID. New Hampshire· 2017-08-21
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court· 1989-03-22· cited 2,142×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court· 1975-04-28· cited 2,115×
- Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyD.C. Circuit· 1990-12-04· cited 1,525×
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 1,251×
- National Archives & Records Administration v. FavishSupreme Court· 2004-03-30· cited 945×
- Federal Bureau of Investigation v. AbramsonSupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 788×
- GUILLERMO FELIPE DUEÑAS ITURRALDE v. COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCYD.C. Circuit· 2003-01-17· cited 566×
- Petroleum Information Corporation v. United States Department of the InteriorD.C. Circuit· 1992-10-27· cited 452×
- United States v. Weber Aircraft Corp.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 239×
- Beatrice Maynard v. Central Intelligence Agency, Beatrice Maynard v. Central Intelligence AgencyFirst Circuit· 1993-02-04· cited 232×
- Texaco Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Department of Consumer AffairsFirst Circuit· 1995-07-19· cited 186×
- Lahr v. National Transportation Safety BoardNinth Circuit· 2009-06-22· cited 156×
- National Security Archive v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2014-05-20· cited 156×
- Mulero Rodriguez v. Ponte, Inc.First Circuit· 1996-10-28· cited 155×
- Town of Norfolk and Town of Walpole v. United States Army Corps of EngineersFirst Circuit· 1992-07-15· cited 141×
- Providence Journal Company and Gerald M. Carbone v. United States Department of the ArmyFirst Circuit· 1992-12-08· cited 88×
- Harry E. Hoover v. The United States Department of the InteriorFifth Circuit· 1980-02-15· cited 86×
- Enviro Tech International, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencySeventh Circuit· 2004-06-10· cited 73×
- Appleton Papers, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencySeventh Circuit· 2012-12-26· cited 69×
- Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics v. United States Forest ServiceNinth Circuit· 2008-05-01· cited 66×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.