Stalb v. Stalb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding prenuptial agreement was valid where parties retained their own property and wife was not public charge but left with “standard of living far below that realized during the marriage”
• concluding an “antenuptial agreement is a contract”
• reviewing denial of Rule 60(b) motion based on newly discovered evidence
• under New York law, antenuptial agreement will be overturned as unconscionable only if its terms would shock conscience of reasonable person
• “[I]f the [prenuptial] contract is valid where made, it will be interpreted here according to the law of the state of its making, so long as to do so will not violate the public policy of the State of Vermont.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).