Skip to main content
· 5/17/1983

Staker v. Huntington Cleveland Irrigation Co.

Citations

  • 664 P.2d 1188
  • 1983 Utah LEXIS 1050

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The statute of limitations must be pleaded as an affirmative defense in a responsive pleading or it is waived.\
  • “The statute of limitations must be pleaded as an affirmative defense in a responsive pleading or it is waived.”
  • prejudgment interest granted in an action to recover a overpayment of water subscription charges
  • trial court’s denial of motion to amend answer on day of trial affirmed
  • “The statute of limitations defense must be pleaded as an affirmative defense in a responsive pleading, or it is waived . . . .” (cleaned up)
  • prejudgment interest granted in an action to recover a overpayment of water subscription charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Hall, Oaks, Howe, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.