Skip to main content
· 1/25/1936

Staker v. Gillen

Citations

  • 143 Kan. 212
  • 53 P.2d 821
  • 1936 Kan. LEXIS 304

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A litigant may have [prudential standing] if the litigant has a special injury or right . . . .”
  • “Even if the prior decision was erroneous, that alone is insufficient to avoid application of the law of the case doctrine.”
  • “Whether the law of the case doctrine applies is a question of law that [this Court] review[s] de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wedell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.