Skip to main content
· 10/4/2005

Staggs v. United States Ex Rel. Department of Health & Human Services

Citations

  • 425 F.3d 881
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 21446
  • 2005 WL 2436921

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an administrative claim requires “a written statement sufficiently describing the injury to enable the agency to begin its own investigation”
  • noting that sufficiency “presents a question of law subject to de novo review”
  • stating that the “FTCA’s presentation requirements are jurisdictional and cannot be waived”
  • stating that the “FTCA’s presentation requirements are jurisdictional and cannot be waived”
  • stating that the “FTCA’s presentation requirements are jurisdictional and cannot be waived”
  • stating that the “FTCA’s presentation requirements are jurisdictional and cannot be waived”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Hartz, McCONNELL

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.