Staggs v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no claim of duress when party accepted benefits of agreement for nearly four years before claiming duress
• applying Arizona law to tort claims for unfair 2 Rindlisbacher’s argument that A.R.S. § 12-341.01 only applies to contracts governed by Arizona law lacks merit. Nothing in the statute imposes that limitation. 5 competition, despite a California choice-of-law provision
• “Claims arising in tort are not ordinarily controlled by a contractual choice of law provision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).