· 2/17/1908

Stafford v. Richard

Citations

121 La. 76
46 So. 107
1908 La. LEXIS 636

Syllabus

1. Vendor and ‘ Purchaser — “Promise of Sale” — Effect—“Sale”—The Equivalent. The promise of sale was, in effect, a sale. [Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 48, Vendor and Purchaser, § 17. For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, voi. 7, pp. 6291-G306; vol. 8, p. 7793.] 2. Same — A Sale. The acts of the parties have brought the promise to the state of an actual sale. 3. Specific Performance — Performance by Plaintiff — Proof to be Made. The buyer being in possession, and having paid in addition to the “earnest money” an amount on the remainder of the price, it only remains for him to prove his willingness and ability to pay the remainder of the price. After legal and sufficient proof made — and deposit of remainder, if necessary — then it will be incumbent upon the seller to sign the deed. [Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 44, Specific Performance, §§ 286-298.] 4. Same — Deed. The buyer will be held to the necessity of proving that he has complied with all needful renuirements on his part to complete the sale. [Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 44, Specific Performance, § 383.] (Syllabus by the Court.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that index descriptions were insufficient because specific policies were “never identified or described”
rejecting claim of privacy exemption for domains when the agency failed to show how domains could reveal personal information
finding index descriptions insufficient because specific policies “never identified or described”
“Where the agencies 13 have fallen short, the Court concludes that summary judgment in neither side’s favor is appropriate at this juncture. The Court instead orders that the agencies produce the documents at issue for in camera review[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.