Skip to main content
· 5/11/1915

Stafford v. Big Sandy & Kentucky River Railway Co.

Citations

  • 164 Ky. 582
  • 176 S.W. 14
  • 1915 Ky. LEXIS 420

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The “standard of relevance established by the Federal Rules of Evidence is not high.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.