Staeheli v. City of St. Paul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that city council did not deprive property owner of procedural due process by setting and enforcing strict, arbitrary time limit in license-cancellation proceeding
• stating that “a reviewing court . . . will not retry facts or make credibility determinations”
• noting that a professional license is important to an individual’s “livelihood and constitutes a substantial private interest”
• stating that “reviewing court ... will not retry facts or make credibility determinations”
• noting the relator failed to show “that he was unable to present material evidence or that the board was unable to thoroughly consider an important issue”
• applying the law of the case to avoid revisiting a jurisdictional challenge because “[t]his Court’s order denying plaintiff’s motion to dismiss based on the jurisdiction of this Court controls the outcome of this issue on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).