Skip to main content
· 6/22/2010

Stadt v. Fox News Network LLC

Citations

  • 719 F. Supp. 2d 312
  • 96 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1115
  • 38 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2461
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62175
  • 2010 WL 2540957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing a Section 349 claim when the plaintiff did not allege harm to the public beyond consumer confusion
  • stating the elements of a breach of contract claim under New York law
  • \[R]everse passing off does not constitute an extra element for preemption purposes because it is essentially a claim for unauthorized use of copyrightable material.\
  • “A conversion claim may only succeed if the party alleges a wrong that is distinct from any contractual obligations.”
  • \The [plaintiff] must allege the specific provisions of the contract upon which the breach of contract is based. A claim for breach of contract cannot be sustained simply by a conclusory statement that the accused breached a contract.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shira A. Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.