Skip to main content
· 9/6/2023

Stadium Casino RE, LLC v. PGCB, Pet of: PGCB

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that retail store parking lot was not “open to the public” and that the retail store could exclude nonemployee union members from parking lot
  • distinguishes rights grounded in National Labor Relations Act from those flowing from Constitution
  • “Early in the history-of the ... Act the Board recognized the importance of freedom of communication to the free exercise of organization rights.”
  • private property not subject to first amendment unless it assumes “the functional attributes of public property devoted to public use”
  • “The First and Fourteenth Amendments are limitations on state action, not on [private] action ... for private purposes.”
  • private owner of 70,000 square foot hardware store permitted to enjoin solicitation on the store’s parking lot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.