Stacy v. Gibson

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 2751

Syllabus

The trial court correctly ordered that $10,000 disbursed from appellant's 401(k) plan and held in trust by his attorney be paid to Ace Sprinkler, Inc.'s receiver for distribution to an Ace employee and to appellant's former partner in the business. The funds were not protected by R.C. 2329.66, and appellant was unjustly enriched by the funds, which came from the employee's and partner's payroll deductions. Judgment affirmed.