Skip to main content
· 8/7/1980

Stack v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Co.

Citations

  • 615 P.2d 457
  • 94 Wash. 2d 155
  • 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • tactic used by railroads to discourage injured employees from engaging in litigation interferes with natural law rights of each employee as a human being
  • tactic used by railroads to discourage injured employees from engaging in litigation interferes with natural law rights of each employee as a human being
  • “ ‘the crew’s testimony will be affected because they will be reluctant to testify candidly when their own pocketbooks are in jeopardy’ ”
  • \ 'the crew's testimony will be affected because they will be reluctant to testify candidly when their own pocketbooks are in jeopardy' \
  • a broad interpretation of “device” is “supported both by the purpose of the act and by case authority”
  • a broad interpretation of “device” is “supported both by the purpose of the act and by case authority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stafford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.