· 8/7/1980
Stack v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Co.
Citations
- 615 P.2d 457
- 94 Wash. 2d 155
- 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1346
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- tactic used by railroads to discourage injured employees from engaging in litigation interferes with natural law rights of each employee as a human being
- tactic used by railroads to discourage injured employees from engaging in litigation interferes with natural law rights of each employee as a human being
- “ ‘the crew’s testimony will be affected because they will be reluctant to testify candidly when their own pocketbooks are in jeopardy’ ”
- \ 'the crew's testimony will be affected because they will be reluctant to testify candidly when their own pocketbooks are in jeopardy' \
- a broad interpretation of “device” is “supported both by the purpose of the act and by case authority”
- a broad interpretation of “device” is “supported both by the purpose of the act and by case authority”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stafford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.