Skip to main content
· 4/16/2001

Stacey Thomas Lee v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, a Delaware Corporation

Citations

  • 245 F.3d 1102
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 3685
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2976
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6437
  • 2001 WL 370184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering “whether the nature of the district court opinion should have put the appellee on notice of the need to file a cross-appeal” (citation omitted)
  • noting that we generally require a notice of cross-appeal where, as here, a party “seeks to increase its monetary recovery or decrease its monetary liability . . . [or] if an issue affects a legal right 3 AFFIRMED. that may have an impact on damage recovery.”
  • “A prevailing party need not cross-petition to defend a judgment on any ground properly raised below, so long as that party seeks to preserve, and not to change, the judgment.”
  • party that seeks “‘to change’” the judgment must file a cross-appeal
  • finding federal funds preempts state tort claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, Wardlaw, Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.