Stacey Stephens v. John Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “individuals are similarly situated when they have similar jobs and display similar conduct”
• holding that a court may 19 consider “all claims of discrimination that fall within the scope of the EEOC’s actual investigation 20 or an EEOC investigation that could reasonably be expected to grow out of the charge.”
• holding that a court 14 || may consider “all claims of discrimination that fall within the scope of the EEOC’s actual 3 15 investigation or an EEOC investigation that could reasonably be expected to grow out of the z 16 || charge”
• finding no causal link where the protected activity occurred thirteen months before the adverse action
• listing elements of a hostile work environment claim, discussing factors for determining whether conduct is severe or pervasive, and requiring that the work environment be both subjectively and objectively abusive
• dismissing a retaliation 28 claim because the employee “failed to show a causal link”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).