Skip to main content
· 10/9/2014

Stacey D. Cox v. State of Indiana

Citations

  • 19 N.E.3d 287
  • 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 497
  • 2014 WL 5088274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, when a challenge to denial of motion for a directed verdict is waived, the appellate court may “analyze the argument as a sufficiency claim” (citations omitted)
  • \[O]ne who elects to present evidence after a denial of [her] motion for directed verdict made at the end of the State's case waives appellate review of the denial of that motion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Bailey, Pyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.