Staceen M. Sinkler v. Midwest Property Management Limited Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evaluating whether the plaintiffs inability to drive to and from work “constituted a significant barrier to her employment,” thereby impairing her ability to work
• evaluating whether the plaintiff’s inability to drive to and from work “constituted a signifi- cant barrier to her employment,” thereby impairing her ability to work
• “getting to and from work” is not of equal significance to enumerated major life activities and thus is not a major life activity; “rather . . . [it] is a sub-species of the activity of ‘working’ or of ‘driving’ ”
• plaintiff not substantially limited in working when broad range of jobs remained open to her
• facts in the record demonstrated that a broad range of jobs remained open to the plaintiff where she was able to find a job in the same line of work after her discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).