ST. VINCENT’S MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Court of Federal claims jurisdiction barred by § 405(h)
• noting that the Medicare Act contained such a “comprehensive scheme for administrative and judicial review of Medicare reimbursement claims” that the Court of Federal Claims’ Tucker Act jurisdiction over such a claim had been preempted
• “Because the Medicare Act contains its own comprehensive administrative and judicial review scheme, there is no Tucker Act jurisdiction over Medicare reimbursement claims.”
• “[U]nder the plain terms of [the Medicare Act], the Court of Federal Claims lack[s] jurisdiction to review ... Medicare reimbursement elaim[s].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).