Skip to main content
· 11/22/2019

St. v. Tebbens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no- review exception did not apply where “Plaintiffs’ arguments … conflate their opportunity to obtain certain types of relief with the availability of judicial review.”
  • “Unlike the Medicare Act, the Medicaid Act does not incorporate the Social Security Act’s claim-channeling and jurisdiction-stripping provisions, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and (h

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.