St. Pierre v. Fulflex, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that legislature clearly intended that workers’ compensation act and unemployment security act be construed together, thus prohibiting worker from receiving both unemployment compensation and workers’ compensation payments for same period
• finding that an employee cannot receive both workers' compensation and unemployment benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Levesque v. Rhode Island Department of Transportation
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1993-06-29· cited 12×
• Memorial Hosp. of Dodge County v. Porter
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1996-05-28· cited 8×
• Wright v. Rhode Island Superior Court
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1988-01-14· cited 5×
• Lambert v. Stanley-Bostitch, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1999-02-02· cited 3×
• Horbet v. New Penn, Inc.
  Superior Court of Rhode Island· 2011-01-10
• Sousa v. Providence Subaru Co.
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1996-12-22

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Calise
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1984-07-09· cited 30×
• Almstead v. Department of Employment Security
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1984-07-27· cited 10×
• Brown v. Hope Service Station, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1979-07-27· cited 7×