St. Paul Table Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute designating marijuana as a schedule I controlled substance does not violate the Washington Constitution
• holding that the legislative classification of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, harmful to health, was reasonable
• holding that the statute designating marijuana as a schedule I controlled substance does not violate the Washington Constitution
• recognizing that this court need not address issues raised solely by amicus or not raised at trial court unless necessary to reach a proper decision
• noting that where experts disagree, the court has refused to substitute its judgment for that of the legislature
• noting that where experts disagree, the court has refused to substitute its judgment for that of the legislature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).