St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Genova

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[a]s defendants would have it, the two exclusionary clauses are inconsistent hence creating an ambiguity ... so as to preclude the application of the crystal-clear language of the exclusion ... [t]hat position is patently unpersuasive ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).