St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Commercial Union Assurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the words used in a contract of insurance will be given their usual and ordinary meaning absent evidence of a contrary intent of the parties”
• “We perceive ... no conflict of laws issue which necessitates a decision on choice of law.”
• “We perceive . . . no conflict of laws issue which necessitates a decision on choice of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).