St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Brunswick Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• insurer had no duty to defend under “advertising injury” provision that covered injury caused by “oral, written or electronic publication of material in your Advertisement that violates a person’s right of privacy” (emphasis omitted)
• “[T]his court concludes that on this point American States is the better reasoned opinion and more likely to be followed by the Illinois Supreme Court [than the appellate court’s opinion in the instant case]”
• “[T]his court concludes that on this point American States is the better reasoned opinion and more likely to be followed by the Illinois Supreme Court [than the appellate court’s opinion in the instant case]”
• insurer had no duty to defend under “advertising injury” provision that covered injury caused by “oral, written or electronic publication of material in your Advertisement that violates a person’s right of privacy” (emphasis -14- omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).