St. Marys Foundry, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, under Ohio law, a court “cannot look to evidence outside of the policy where the contract is clear and unambiguous”
• cautioning that, if a policy term is unambiguous, the insured “may not have the benefit of interpretative doctrines that require [a court] to read an ambiguous exclusion in favor of coverage”
• noting - 43 - No. 08-1301 Conti v. American Axle that this court exercises “discretion to rule on an issue not decided below only in exceptional cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).