St. Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying enforcement where Board failed to address whether employee “falsely and publicly disparage[d] her employer or its products and services”
• nurse accused the hospital of “jeopardizing the health of mothers and babies by offering her and her counterparts short shifts and more responsibilities”
• nurse’s public statements relating to ongoing labor dispute were unprotected because she “disparaged the quality of patient care being provided by [her employer] in a way guaranteed to adversely affect the hospital’s reputation with prospective patients and the public at large”
• nurse’s public statements relating to ongoing labor dispute were unprotected because she “disparaged the quality of patient care being provided by [her employer] in a way guaranteed to adversely affect the hospital’s reputation with prospective patients and the public at large”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).