Court of Appeals of Georgia· 8/15/2014
St. Louis v. State
Citations
- 328 Ga. App. 837
- 763 S.E.2d 126
- 2014 WL 3973249
- 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 583
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Conviction of loitering or prowling was authorized where the suspect’s explanation to a law enforcement officer failed to account for his possession of a flashlight and thick wool gloves on a warm day.
- evidence was sufficient to support loitering and prowling conviction when the defendant was discovered outside of the victim’s apartment in the dark with items that could be used for a burglary, and he had unlatched and opened a screen door
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barnes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Meeks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-08-29· cited 22×
- Nangreave v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-11-13· cited 20×
- McFarren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-11-15· cited 12×
- Rollins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-31· cited 12×
- Wise v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-12-10· cited 9×
- Hubbard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-09-14· cited 7×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-10-25· cited 7×
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-11-06· cited 6×
- In the Interest of I. M. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-01-20· cited 5×
- Viers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-03-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.