St. Louis v. Myers
Citations
- 113 U.S. 566
- 5 S. Ct. 640
- 28 L. Ed. 1131
- 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1707
Syllabus
<p>The act of March 6, 1820, 3 Stat. 545, admitting Missouri into the Union left the rights of riparian owners on the Mississippi River to be settled according to the principles of State law.</p> <p>The act of June 12, 1866, § 9, 14 Stat. 63, relinquishing to the city of St. Louis the rights of the United States in wharves and thoroughfares, did not authorize the city to impair the rights of other riparian proprietors by extending streets into the river.</p> <p>This ease presents no Federal question to give jurisdiction to the court, and is distinguished from Railway Co. v. Renwick, 102 U. S. 180.</p>
Judges: Waite
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 734×
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court· 1891-05-11· cited 381×
- Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court· 1891-03-12· cited 126×
- Sage v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals· 1897-10-12· cited 104×
- St. Anthony Falls Water Power Company v. St. Paul Water Commissioners; Minneapolis Mill Company v. SameSupreme Court· 1897-11-29· cited 88×
- City of Grand Rapids v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court· 1891-12-21· cited 32×
- St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co. v. St. Paul Water Comm'rsSupreme Court· 1897-11-29· cited 22×
- Webber v. Pere Marquette Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1886-10-07· cited 20×
- United States v. Central Stockholders Corp. of VallejoNinth Circuit· 1931-08-29· cited 16×
- Sewers v. HacklanderMichigan Supreme Court· 1922-06-17· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.