Skip to main content
· 4/24/1916

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Ellenwood

Citations

  • 123 Ark. 428
  • 185 S.W. 768
  • 1916 Ark. LEXIS 478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • nondelegable duty doctrine only applies if plaintiff establishes defendant maintained possession and control of property
  • ‘‘Ordinarily, the status of one who sustains injury while upon the property of another is a question of fact. . . . Where, however, the facts essential to the determination of the plain- tiff’s status are not in dispute, a legal question is presented.’’ [Internal quotation marks omitted.]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.