Skip to main content
· 4/4/1910

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Arkansas

Citations

  • 217 U.S. 136
  • 30 S. Ct. 476
  • 54 L. Ed. 698
  • 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1949

Syllabus

<p>Where the constitutional defenses asserted in 'the answer, and embraced in the instructions asked, and refused, in an action for penalties for violating an order of a state commission are not confined to the reasonableness of the order as such, but also challenge the power of the State to inflict the penalty at all under the circumstances disclosed by the answer, the judgment does not rest on grounds of local law alone, but a Federal right has been set up and denied which gives this court jurisdiction to review the judgment under § 709, Rev. Stat. •</p> <p>Á state statute which compels a railroad to distribute cars for shipments in a manner that subjects it*to payment of heavy penalties in connection with its interstate business imposes a burden on its interstate business, and is unconstitutional under the commerce clause of the Constitution; and so held in regard to the Arkansas act. and order of the commission in regard to distribution of cars for shipment of freight.</p> <p>Whether or not the rules of an association of railroads in regard to exchange of cars are efficient to secure just dealings as to cars moved in interstate commerce is a matter within Federal control, and it is beyond' the power of a state court to determine that they are inefficient and’to compel a member of the association to violate such rules.</p> <p>85 Arkansas, 311, reversed.</p>

Judges: White, Fuller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.