St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. Seale

Citations

• 229 U.S. 156
• 33 S. Ct. 651
• 57 L. Ed. 1129
• 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2430

Syllabus

<p>Where the Federal Employers’ Liability'Act is applicable, the state statute on the same subject is excluded by reason of the supremacy of the former.</p> <p>Where the Federal Employers’ Liability Act applies, no one but the injured employé or, in case of his death, his personal representative, can maintain the action.</p> <p>Whether the Federal or state statute is applicable depends upon whether the injuries of the employé were sustained while the company was engaged and the employé was employed in interstáte - commerce.</p> <p>An employé whose duty is to take the numbers of, and seal up and label, cars, some of which are engaged in interstate, and some in intrastate, traffic, is directly and not indirectly engaged in interstate commérce.</p> <p>Interstate transportation is not ended by the arrival of the train at the terminal. The breaking up of the train and moving the cars to the appropriate tracks for making up new trains for further destination or for unloading is as much a part of interstate transportation as the movement across the state line.</p> <p>Where plaintiff’s petition states a case under the state statute, but on the evidence it appears that the case is controlled by the Federal statute, and the defendant has duly excepted, the state court is bound to take notice of the objection and dismiss if plaintiff is not entitled to recover under the Federal statute.</p>