Skip to main content
· 11/28/1927

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Lawrence

Citations

  • 30 F.2d 454
  • 1927 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “there is no right to counsel in a summary contempt proceeding” under ORS 33.096
  • “The power to punish individuals for direct contempt in a summary proceeding is within the inherent authority of the court, and is necessary to preserve order and dignity in the judicial process.”
  • “The power to punish individuals for direct contempt in a summary pro- ceeding is within the inherent authority of the court, and is necessary to preserve order and dignity in the judicial process.”
  • reviewing summary contempt for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.