· 11/28/1927
St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Lawrence
Citations
- 30 F.2d 454
- 1927 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1801
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “there is no right to counsel in a summary contempt proceeding” under ORS 33.096
- “The power to punish individuals for direct contempt in a summary proceeding is within the inherent authority of the court, and is necessary to preserve order and dignity in the judicial process.”
- “The power to punish individuals for direct contempt in a summary pro- ceeding is within the inherent authority of the court, and is necessary to preserve order and dignity in the judicial process.”
- reviewing summary contempt for abuse of discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.