Skip to main content
· 11/21/1979

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. R. A. Wade, Jr., Etc., Defendants-Appellees-Cross

Citations

  • 607 F.2d 126
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, in case applying Alabama law and the Restatement, that “once an owner erects an artificial structure[,] his neighbor . . . continues to have the same duty [of lateral support] as before”; “the duty of lateral support is neither enlarged nor diminished”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tuttle, Godbold, Rubin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.