St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Vanzego
Citations
- 71 Kan. 427
- 80 P. 944
- 1905 Kan. LEXIS 154
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Practice, District Court — Argument to Jury. Where, on the trial of a case in a district court, the arguments to the jury are limited to one hour on each side, and the attorney for the party on whom rests the burden of the issue announces that he desires to occupy only thirty minutes and requests the court to inform him when the time has expired, which the court does, and he ceases without request for further time, and thereupon the attorney for the opposing party asks that the ease be submitted without further argument, it is prejudicial error to permit another attorney to address the jury in behalf of the first party.</p>
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.