· 11/9/1914
St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Dyer
Citations
- 115 Ark. 262
- 170 S.W. 1013
- 1914 Ark. LEXIS 105
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that motion to open judgment of strict foreclosure, filed one year after judgment rendered, involves trial court’s authority, rather than jurisdiction, but not citing Argent
- “]t]he issue in this appeal is whether the court properly determined that it lacked authority to open the judgment of strict foreclosure . . . [which] presents a question of law over which our review is plenary”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirby, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.