Skip to main content
· 11/9/1914

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Dyer

Citations

  • 115 Ark. 262
  • 170 S.W. 1013
  • 1914 Ark. LEXIS 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that motion to open judgment of strict foreclosure, filed one year after judgment rendered, involves trial court’s authority, rather than jurisdiction, but not citing Argent
  • “]t]he issue in this appeal is whether the court properly determined that it lacked authority to open the judgment of strict foreclosure . . . [which] presents a question of law over which our review is plenary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirby, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.