St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Nunley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting sufficiency challenge to first degree sexual assault conviction when complainant’s testimony, if credited, satisfied all ele- ments of § 53a-70 (a) (1)
• defendant required to utilize available court procedures to protect rights, including requests for continuance
• it was within trial court’s discretion ‘‘to exclude the [complainant’s] medical records, as they would not have disclosed material sufficiently probative of the defendant’s theory of defense to justify breaching their confidentiality’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).