St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. J. F. Hasty & Sons
Citations
- 255 U.S. 252
- 41 S. Ct. 269
- 65 L. Ed. 614
- 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1818
Syllabus
<p>1. Where a case in the District Court arising under the Constitution has been reviewed by this court under Jud. Code, § 238, this court, retains jurisdiction to review a supplementary decree of the District Court not directly involving any constitutional -question. P. 254. Arkadelphia Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., 249 U. S. 134.</p> <p>2. A tariff giving special rates on rough wood material on shipment to mill, on condition that certain percentages of it by weight should be shipped over the same line after manufacture, and which specified ■as rough materials “Rough Lumber, Staves, Flitches, Bolts, and Logs,” and among finished materials “Staves and Heading,” held applicable to “bolts” out of which barrel headings were made, the term “bolts” in this connection having a loose generic meaning. Id.</p> <p>3. Where , the meaning of such a tariff was plain, held that an application for a construction by the state commission by which it was promulgated was not necessary for enforcement of a shipper’^ rights under it. P. 256.</p>
Judges: Pitney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.