St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. DeWitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining appellants had forfeited nonjurisdictional constitutional challenge to the validity of the appointment of Copyright Royalty Judges by the Library of Congress
• declining to address Appointments Clause challenge to the Copyright Royalty 24 Board members raised in supplemental briefing because it was “untimely”
• determining appellants had forfeited nonjurisdictional constitutional challenge to the validity of the appointment of Copyright Royalty Judges by the Library of Congress
• “[T]he words of a statute must be read in their context and with a view to their place in the overall statutory scheme.”
• “[T]he words of a statute must be read in their context and with a view to their place in the overall statutory scheme.”
• “[Appellant] has forfeited its argument by failing to raise it in its opening brief.” (citing Sw. Airlines Co. v. Transp. Sec. Admin., 554 F.3d 1065, 1072 (D.C. Cir. 2009))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).