Skip to main content
· 11/16/1903

St. Louis Hay & Grain Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 191 U.S. 159
  • 24 S. Ct. 47
  • 48 L. Ed. 130
  • 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1473
  • 39 Ct. Cl. 543

Syllabus

<p>When a void but not illegal contract of sale has been performed on both sides, the vendor cannot recover on a quantum valébat less the amount' already paid.</p> <p>The United States bought hay for a camp, providing that the quantity bought be decreased at its option, not exceeding twenty per cent, and if the troops should be wholly or in part withdrawn the contract should become inoperative to the extent of such reduction, and that deliveries were 'to begin within five-days and proceed at daily rates of at least one sixtieth of the amount, or in such quantities and in such times afterward as might be designated by the quartermaster. The troops were withdrawn, orders were delayed beyond sixty days and a little less than the whole amount was ordered. The claimant protested and claimed damages but accepted payment for the whole without reserving any rights at the time.</p> <p>Held that there was no breach of contract by the United States even if it was still open to the claimants to demand damages in case of a breach, and if the setting up of the invalidity of the contract by the United States in answer to the demand would have opened the way to a quantum valebat.</p>

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.