St. Louis Effort for Aids v. Huff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, for purposes of reconsideration, that, where law “remains unsettled,” movant “fail[s] to establish that the court committed clear error” by not following non-controlling line of cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• South Carolina v. United States
  D. South Carolina· 2017-02-07· cited 49×
• St. Louis Effort For AIDS v. Chlora Lindley-Myers
  Eighth Circuit· 2017-12-18· cited 4×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2008-11-12· cited 11,986×
• Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 1981-01-07· cited 1,932×
• Arizona v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 1,166×
• Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-19· cited 1,032×
• National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
  Supreme Court· 2012-06-28· cited 1,025×
• Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
  Supreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 588×
• Cyril Korte v. HHS
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-11-08· cited 361×
• Watkins Incorporated v. Lloyd M. Lewis and Sandra G. Lewis
  Eighth Circuit· 2003-10-21· cited 352×
• Hillman v. Maretta
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-03· cited 172×
• California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-28· cited 127×
• Fred Keller, Jr. v. City of Fremont
  Eighth Circuit· 2013-06-28· cited 49×
• Shrink Missouri Government PAC v. Adams
  Eighth Circuit· 1998-07-23· cited 8×

Other cases named St. Louis Effort for Aids v. Huff

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• St. Louis Effort for AIDS v. Huff
  W.D. Missouri· 2016-03-16· cited 1×