Skip to main content
· 1/15/1866

St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad v. Gilham

Citations

  • 39 Ill. 455

Syllabus

<p>1, Rah-boads—diligence required (o prevent injury ly fire. Railroad companies should use all the appliances of science, and the highest degree of diligence, to prevent the destruction of property contiguous to their lines, by means of fire escaping from their passing engines.</p> <p>2. New teial—verdict contrary to evidence. In an action against a railroad company to recover for damage to property along its line, occasioned by fire escaping from a passing locomotive, it was at least a matter of doubt from the evidence whether the proper appliances and diligence were used to prevent the escape of the fire, and the court refused to disturb a verdict against the company.</p>

Judges: Lawrence

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.